法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 同性伴侶不准找代理孕母傳宗接代嗎?
編著譯者: 王服清
出版日期: 2018.04
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 18 期 /40-57 頁
頁  數: 11 點閱次數: 1086
下載點數: 44 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 王服清
關 鍵 詞: 2008 年英國人類受精與胚胎學法人工生殖代理孕母多元成家同性伴侶
中文摘要: 根據醫界推估,全臺有 5000 至 1 萬名婦女,無法透過自己的子宮懷孕。礙於現行人工生殖法限制繁多,許多婦女遠赴國外尋求代理孕母協助。1996 年臺灣首度草擬代理孕母立法,人工生殖法修正草案終究還是於 2016 年 10 月被退回,至今仍未明文規定,且觀察人工生殖法之修法歷程相當獨厚異性婚之代孕生殖,忽視同性伴侶之生殖權。代理孕母的議題涉及倫理、宗教、婦女權益等,本文將以「同性伴侶能否找代理孕母作為傳宗接代方式」之子議題為討論核心,分析其在臺灣的正當性,以及未來法制必須對此作出調整。
英文關鍵詞: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelandartificial reproductionsurrogate mothermultiple marriagehomosexual partner
英文摘要: According to medical estimates, there are 5000 to 10000 women in Taiwan who can not get pregnant through their own womb. Because of the current multiplication restrictions of the existing artificial reproductive laws, many women have gone abroad to seek assistance for surrogate mothers. Taiwan first drafted the legislation on surrogate motherhood in 1996, and the draft amendment of the artificial reproductive law was finally with drawed in October 2016 and it has not yet been clearly formulated. And to observe the legislative process of artificial reproductive law is immer quitely paying attention to the surrogate motherhood about the heterosexual marriage, ignoring the reproductive rights of same-sex partners. The issues of surrogate motherhood involve ethics, religion and the rights and interests of women. In this paper, the sub- issues of "whether same-sex partners can find a surrogate mother for offspring or not?" is discussed at the core of the discussion, and it’s possibility of legitimacy in Taiwan is analyzed. This makes the draft amendment of the artificial reproductive law to it’s future adjustments.
目  次: 壹、同性伴侶無生殖自由權?
貳、多元成家之日益接受
參、2016~2017 年代孕生殖議題之矚目討論
肆、2008 年英國人類受精與胚胎學法
伍、2007 年現行人工生殖法僅限夫妻代孕生殖之違憲疑慮
陸、以收養制度作為同性伴侶代孕生子之替代方案
柒、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列