| 關 鍵 詞： |
共有物；分管契約；分管決定；不當得利；侵權行為；物上請求權 |
| 中文摘要： |
共有物唯有透過分管行為方能特定利用，於 98 年 7 月 23 日民法第 820 條修正施行前，「分管契約」與「分管決定」無區別之必要，但修正施行後，兩者之區別即顯重要。分管行為可否多數決？多數決究以「分管契約」或「分管決定」為之較佳？「分管契約」之法律依據為何？「分管契約」與「分管決定」兩者之法律效果，不僅在民法第 820 條第 2 至 4 項所設對共有人之保護措施適用上，有其不同外，另在不當得利、侵權行為及物上請求權上，亦有所差異。本文旨在整理民法第 820 條修正後，實務上關於「分管契約」及「分管決定」之法律見解，分門別類，建立其體系，以釐清上開問題，俾供學界與實務之參考。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
The Thing Held in Indivision；Separate-Management Covenant；Separate-Management Decision；Unjust Enrichment；Torts；Claim in Rem |
| 英文摘要： |
The thing held in indivision can be specific use only when the decision is made by the majority of co-owners. To distinct differences between “the separate-management of the thing held in indivision by a covenant (separatemanagement covenant)” and “the separate-management of the thing held in indivision by the majority of co-owners’ decision (separate-management decision)” is unnecessary before the Article 820 amendment to the Civil Law was adopted on July 23, 98th year of the Republic. However, the differences between the two have become significant after the amendment. Can specific use in the thing held in indivision by the majority of co-owners be applicable? Is specific use in the thing held in indivision by the majority of co-owners better by covenant or co-owners’ decision? What is the legal basis for the “separate-management covenant”? The different legal effects between “separate-management covenant” and “separate-management decision” are not only applicable to the protection measures of the co-owners set out in the Article 820 II-IV, but also different in the unjust enrichment, the torts, and the claim in rem. In order to clarify these issues, this article aims to establish an explanation system and to provide reference for the academic and practical after the Article 820 amendment collates the “separate-management covenant” with the “separate-management decision” regarding their individual legal opinions.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、分管契約與分管決定區別之實務見解
一、分管可多數決
二、分管不可多數決
參、分管區別之方向
一、分管應得多數決
二、以分管決定可多數決為佳
三、分管契約之依據
肆、分管法律效果之區別
一、民法第 820 條之權利
二、分管不成之法院介入權
三、不當得利
四、侵權行為
五、無權占有
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|