法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
行政罰調查程序之探討(Discussion on the Procedure of Administrative Punishment Investigation)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 劉俊男
出版日期: 2019.04
刊登出處: 台灣/軍法專刊第 65 卷 第 2 期/114-137 頁
頁  數: 24 點閱次數: 1168
下載點數: 96 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 軍法專刊社 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 行政調查行政檢查正當法律程序刑事搜索資料蒐集
中文摘要: 「行政調查」係行政機關為行使其權限、達成行政目的,事先必須收集各種情報資料之行為,包括質問、進入、檢查及調查等。例如對違反法令之業者或個人,於決定應否予以警告、命令停止營業或廢除許可時,非對其違反法令之行為事先加以掌握時,可能作出錯誤決定。近年來有關行政調查之討論日趨增多,且關於行政調查制度之建構及學理之探討論著頗多。我國行政程序法有關行政調查部分尚於第 1 章第 6 節設有「調查事實及證據」之規定,對於行政調查之進行在第 39 條及第 40 條分別定有明文,並賦予行政機關行政調查權行使之法源,然為概括、一般性之規定,尚有不足;又行政罰法雖於裁處程序中有相關調查程序之規範,惟該程序似僅就違反行政義務受裁罰行為人身分之查驗、沒入證物之扣留等處置程序之規定,而未對其人身自由、住宅之侵入等調查手段及程序要件予以規範,故為使行政法上調查程序更臻周延,尚有就行政罰法調查程序規定不足之處,詳予檢討之必要,爰藉由本文之研究,提供日後修法之參考。
英文關鍵詞: Administrative InvestigationAdministrative InspectionDue process of lawCriminal searchInformation acquisition
英文摘要: “Administrative investigation” is the act of the administrative organ to collect all kinds of information, including questioning, entry, inspection and investigation, in order to exercise its authority and achieve administrative purposes. For example, if the operator or individual who violates the law decides whether to warn, order to suspend business or revoke the license, it may make a wrong decision when it is not in advance to control the violation of the law. In recent years, the discussion on administrative investigations has been increasing, and there are many discussions about the construction and academic exploration of the administrative investigation system. The administrative investigation section of the Administrative Procedure Law of our country still has the provisions of “Investigation of facts and evidence” in Section 6. The administrative investigation is carried out in Articles 39 and 40 respectively, and the administrative agency is given the power to exercise administrative investigation. The source of law, however, is general and general, and there are still some shortcomings; although the administrative penalty method has the relevant investigation procedures in the procedure of the ruling, the procedure seems to only be for the inspection of the identity of the person who violates the administrative obligation, and the confiscation The procedures for detaining and other disposal procedures are not regulated by the means of investigation and procedures for personal freedom, intrusion of housing, etc. Therefore, in order to make the investigation procedure of administrative law more complicated, there are still insufficient provisions for the administrative punishment investigation procedure. It is necessary to review and provide a reference for future revisions through the research in this paper.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、行政調查學理上概念化之嘗試
一、資料蒐集之整體行為
二、行政調查於實務運用上之功能
三、強制調查與任意調查之界限
四、行政程序法、行政執行法及行政罰法之調查法制分析
五、行政調查與行政指導之關係-輔助關係或使行政調查空洞化
六、行政調查與行政檢查之關聯
參、行政調查與隱私權(資訊自決權)、受調查義務之對立
一、行政調查涉及之隱私權保障
二、與受調查者產生調查義務之對立
肆、行政調查與刑事搜索之關聯性
一、行政調查與刑事偵查之性質比較
二、行政調查與刑事搜索之界限
伍、行政調查之救濟
一、違法行政調查之救濟
二、行政機關怠為調查之救濟
陸、行政罰調查程序重新建構之芻議
一、強制調查程序應符合法律保留原則
二、完備個人資料保護之規範
三、建構違法行政調查之救濟制度
四、於行政罰法中增訂行政調查程序
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
劉俊男,行政罰調查程序之探討,軍法專刊,第 65 卷 第 2 期,114-137 頁,2019年04月。
返回功能列