| 關 鍵 詞： |
不純正不作為犯；醫療義務的浮動性；預見可能性；法律不強人所難；客觀不可避免性 |
| 中文摘要： |
本案首先應檢視者，甲之行為係作為或不作為，因攸關法律適用問題。而對於是否成立過失不純正不作為犯，法院除審查有無「應防止」之保證人義務外，尚應對於甲是否「能防止」及其結果是否具「可避免性」等項，詳予調查審認。則甲雖立於保證人地位，是否能預見並防止結果之發生？縱使認定甲未履行作為義務，與結果間是否具有因果關係？又該結果是否具有「可避免性」？亦即研析本案是否符合過失不純正不作為犯之內涵。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Derivative omission offences；Floating of medical obligations；Foresee the possibility；Cannot expect the actor behaved reasonable behaviors fitting norms；Objectively unavoidable |
| 英文摘要： |
The case should first be reviewed by the inspector. The behavior of A is caused or not, because of the application of the law. In addition to reviewing whether or not a negligence is not a pure or inaction, the court should, in addition to examining whether it is “should prevent” the guarantor's obligations, should also investigate whether A is “can prevent” and whether its results are “avoidable”. recognize. If A is in the status of a guarantor, can it be foreseen and prevent the outcome from happening? Even if it is determined that A has not fulfilled its obligations, is there a causal relationship with the results? Does the result have “avoidability”? That is to say, whether the case is in line with the connotation of negligence and impureness.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、案例事實
貳、判決理由
參、判決評析
一、前言
二、本件首先應檢視是否為「不純正不作為業務過失致人於死構成要件」
三、醫療上客觀必要之注意義務
四、對於規範所期待之行為不予作為
五、不作為與結果間具有因果關係
六、結果之可避免性╱義務違反之關聯性
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|