| 關 鍵 詞： |
都市更新事業計晝核定；永春都更案；共同負擔費用編列；權利價值估算；附理由說明義務；行政法院審查標準 |
| 中文摘要： |
都市更新事業計畫經主管機關核定後，後續的訴訟，主要集中在「問題 1：反對都更戶的抵死不從拆遷問題」，以及後續權利變換計畫中的各個具體爭議，包括「問題 2：房地選配」、「問題 3：共同負擔費用編列」「問題 4：權利價值估算」等問題。本文將以永春都更案作為主軸，依序討論上述這四個問題的產生背景，以及行政法院的審查態度。本文認為，行政法院對共同負擔費用編列所要求的附理由說明義務，審查標準過於嚴格，是錯誤繼受美國法院環評案件的審查標準。本文認為，「問題 3：共同負擔費用編列」和「問題 4：權利價值估算」，屬於同樣的問題屬性，法律對爭議處理的程序應為相同的設計，行政法院對爭議問題的審查也應為相同的審查態度。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Approval of Urban Renewal Business Plan；The Case of Yongchun Urban Renewal；Compilation of Common Shared Expenditures；Evaluation of Rights Values；Reasoned-decision Obligation；The Judicial Review Standard of Administrative Court |
| 英文摘要： |
After the approval of urban renewal business plan, the litigations afterward focus on four type of issues. First issue is that disagreed owners keep resistance against demolition and removing, the other three issues are problems come from the detail and implementation of the rights transformation plans, which are: issue 2: allocating land and buildings, issue 3: compilation of common shared expenditures, and issue 4: evaluation of rights values. I want use the case of Yongchun urban renewal as a lead, to introduce the backgrounds of these four issue in order, and discuss the review attitude on these four issues from administrative courts. Administrative courts mandate the committee of urban renewal offer reason about compilation of common shared expenditures after the Yongchun case. This review standard is too strict, I will explain that the standard is borrowed from the environmental-impact-assessment cases in Taiwan, which were transplanted from the U.S. environmental-impact-assessment cases, but this transplantation is wrong. I will propose that “issue 3: compilation of common shared expenditures” and “issue 4: evaluation of rights values” have the same characteristics, and they should be deal with in the same procedure in laws. For the same reasons, the review attitude on these two issues by administrative courts should be the same.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、都更事業計畫變更與房地選配爭議
一、都市更新事業計畫變更與問題
二、永春都更案第一階段變更之爭議
三、第二階段變更與選配爭議
四、中間評析
參、法院對財務規劃與共同負擔編列之審查
一、財務規劃中共同負擔編列
二、永春都更案發展出來的法院審查態度
三、北投區中央南路都更案
肆、比較美國法院所採取的恣意反覆與附理由說明義務
一、美國環評案件的審查標準與附理由義務
二、美國都更案件的司法審查
伍、法院對共同負擔編列與權利價值估算之審查標準比較與檢討
一、評析永春都更案對共同負擔編列細項之過度審查
二、比較及適用權利價值異議程序
陸、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|