| 關 鍵 詞： |
不確定法律概念；概括條款；法律明確性原則；主要內容；不合營業常規；交易活絡 |
| 中文摘要： |
法律中有許多條文之用語所含之概念具多義性，適用時往往須進一步解釋者，學理上稱為不確定法律概念。法律明確性之要求，非僅指法律文義具體詳盡之體例而言，立法者於立法定制時，仍得衡酌法律所規範生活事實之複雜性及適用於個案之妥當性，從立法上適當運用不確定法律概念或概括條款而為相應之規定。基本上，不確定法律概念之使用，必須其意義可為一般人理解，且為受規範者所得預見，並可經由司法審查加以確認，始無悖於法律明確性原則。本文擬對於證券交易法第二十條之一及第三二條所規定之「主要內容」、第一五五條第一項第四款及第五款所規定之「連續」、「高價」、「低價」及「交易活絡」、第一七一條第一項第二款「不合營業常規」等概念，整理實務見解之發展及爭議關鍵，並提出管蠡之見，以供參考。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Uncertain legal concept；Catch-all clause；Principle of legal clarity；Essential content；Not in the normal course of operation；Brisk trading |
| 英文摘要： |
There are many legal concepts in the law that can be said to be an ambiguity concept, and, often require further interpretation for the application, which is theoretically called an uncertain legal concept. The requirements of legal clarity not only refer to the concrete and detailed system of the law, but legislators, when customizing the legislation, must still weigh the complexity of the facts of life regulated by law and the suitability of the case, and Inevitably should use catch-all clause or uncertain legal concept in the legal provisions. Uncertain legal concepts or general terms are regulated accordingly. Basically, the use of uncertain legal concepts in the legal provisions, must be understood by the ordinary people and foreseeable by the persons who are subject to the regulations, and can be confirmed through judicial review. In accordance with the aforementioned requirements, it does not violate the principle of legal clarity.
This article starts from going over the uncertain legal concept of “essential content”, “continuous”, “high price”, and “low price”, “brisk trading” and “not in the normal course of operation ” stipulated in the Article 20-1, Article 32, Paragraph 1 (4), (5) of Article 155 and Paragraph 1 (2) of Article 171, respectively. Then, it will organize and analyze the development of practical insights and the key disputes, and put personal views for reference. Finally, a concise conclusion with suggestions is made.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、不確定法律概念之解釋或認定
一、證券交易法上不確定法律概念之類型
二、不確定法律概念之解釋原則
三、開放性構成要件之認定方法
參、「主要內容」之認定爭議
一、法院對於主要內容之認定
二、國內學說之見解
肆、「不合營業常規」之認定爭議
一、真實交易或虛假交易之爭議
二、認定基準：重實質而非形式
伍、「連續」之認定爭議
陸、「高價」或「低價」之認定爭議
一、最高法院對於「高價」之認定
二、最高法院對於「低價」之認定
三、國內學說之見解
柒、「交易活絡」之認定爭議
一、法院對於「交易活絡」之認定
二、國內學說之見解
捌、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|