| 關 鍵 詞： |
存活機會；判讀錯誤；延誤治療；過失；舉證責任 |
| 中文摘要： |
病患於 2007 年之 X 光片在縱膈腔部位雖已可見異常陰影，但被告醫師判讀為正常，嗣於 2009 年該病患確診為第四期惡性胸腺瘤。病患主張因被告醫師之判讀錯誤，致其存活機會降低，且受有必須接受額外化學治療所致之損害。各審級法院就如何運用存活機會喪失理論及舉證責任之分配上有不同見解，本文即針對此二爭議點提出評析。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
survival rate；misdiagnosis；delay in treatment；negligence；burden of proof |
| 英文摘要： |
The patient took chest X-ray in 2007 which showed abnormal shadow over mediastinum, yet the accused physician wrongfully interpreted it to be normal. However, the patient was diagnosed to suffer from malignant thymoma in 2009. The patient claimed that the physician’s misdiagnosis caused his taking extra-chemotherapy due to advanced disease pre- and post-operatively and loss of survival chance. The courts differed in their opinions regarding the burden of proof and the application of loss- of-chance doctrine, which were discussed in details in this article.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、案件事實
貳、各審概要
一、地方地方法院
二、高等法院
三、最高法院第一次發回
四、高等法院更一審
五、第二次上訴最高法院
參、本件之評析
一、存活機會喪失
二、舉證責任之分配
肆、結語
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|