| 關 鍵 詞： |
法律解釋；契約解釋；誠信原則；優先承買權；基地租賃 |
| 中文摘要： |
土地法第 104 條就基地租賃之優先承買權，於實務上產生諸多問題。本文以最高法院 106 年度台上字第 2335 號判決出發，探討於該案中所產生而於實務上有重要性之問題。本文所探討之問題包含：於租賃基地所興建者為違章建築時，承租人是否仍享有優先承買權？於租賃基地所建之建物僅位於該基地之一部之上時，得優先承買之範圍為何？若僅得承買土地之一部時，價金應如何計算？以及若僅得承買土地之一部，是否得請求分割該部分之土地？
上開問題均為實務上重要之問題，且於個案中影響甚鉅，惟學說及實務上對此等問題均仍未有統一之見解。本文爰整理學說及實務相關見解，並從法學方法論出發，透過法律解釋、契約解釋及誠信原則，分析土地法第 104 條，對上開問題進行討論並提出見解。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Interpretation of Law；Interpretation of Contract；Principle of Good Faith；Right of First Refusal；Building Site Lease |
| 英文摘要： |
The right of first refusal of the leased building sites in Article 104 of the Land Act has raised a lot of problems in practice. This paper starts from the decision of Supreme Court Judgment Case No.106, Tai Shang Zi, 2335, and goes on to discuss the issues in this case, which are important in practice. The issues concerned includes: Is there a right of first refusal when the building built on the leased land is an illegal structure? When the built structure only remains on a part of the land, then does the right of first refusal exist on the whole plot of land or only the part that there the building is on? If the right of first refusal only exist on part of the land, then how should the buying price be calculated? And if it only exists on part of the land, then could the right holder demand a land division?
These are the issues that plays an important role in applying Article 104 of the Land Act in practice, but there is no consensus on these issues. Therefore, this paper reviews concerned literature and decisions of the Supreme Court, and starts from legal methodology, using the interpretation of the Law, of Contract, and the principle of good faith to discuss the above questions and offers its viewpoint.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、從最高法院 106 年度台上字第 2335 號民事判決談起
一、事實
二、歷審判決
三、問題提出
貳、法律解釋、契約解釋、誠信原則與方法論之關係
一、法律解釋
二、契約解釋
三、誠信原則
參、本案評析
一、違章建築之適用
二、買受土地範圍
三、優先承買之土地價額
四、請求分割優先承買部分之土地
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|