法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
由防止危害到危險預防:由德國警察任務與權限之嬗變檢討我國之警察法制(From Deterrence of Danger to Prevention of Danger)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 林明鏘
出版日期: 2010.12
刊登出處: 台灣/國立臺灣大學法學論叢第 39 卷 第 4 期/167-212 頁
頁  數: 46 點閱次數: 841
下載點數: 184 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 林明鏘
關 鍵 詞: 危害防止危險預防資訊權歐盟化中央化民營化社區化任意盤問架設監視器線上追緝跟監線民捺按指紋案陷害教唆
中文摘要: 德國警察法,傳統上係以「危害防止」為其任務及職權賦予之核心,但隨這國際恐怖攻擊行動的遽增,現代警察任務及職權,正逐步擴大及於「危險預防」,此由警察大量享有資訊蒐集權限立法,可茲證明。「危害防止」的「危害」是一個具體迫在眉睫的危險;而「危險預防」的「危險」,可能僅僅是一種潛在性的、推測性的危險,其間差異甚大。此外,德國警察法學亦受聯邦制改革、歐盟化、民營化及社區化的影響甚大,所以法學研究及判例見解,均朝向有效限縮警察權限之發動,以促成人民自由與安全的平衡。最後本論文針對我國警察法制的演變,諸如:任意盤問權、架設監視器、線上追緝、跟監與線民、按指紋案及其他權限進行逐項檢討,希望提高警察法的規範力量,避免警察權限之急遽擴大,而造成人民自由權利的不平衡受限。
英文關鍵詞: deterrence of dangerprevention of dangerright of informationEuropeanizationfederalizationprivatizationcommunity basedinterrogation discretionsurveillance setupon-line crimeinvestigationtailinginformantscase on fingerprints collectioncircumvention investigation
英文摘要: German Police Law has traditionally put its focus on “deterrence of danger.” As international terrorist attacks increase, modern duty and power of police has expand to “prevention of danger,” evident from legislation on the power of information gathering by the police. The idea of “Danger” between “deterrence of danger” and “prevention of danger” is distinctly different in the ways that the former means dangers that are “clear and present” while the latter means dangers that are merely “latent and prospective.” Additionally, German Police Law has been influenced by the reforms on federalism, Europeanization, privatization, and become community based, leading legal researches and court decisions to opinions on effectively narrowing such police power to strike a balance between individual freedoms and public safety. Finally, this thesis aims on the transformation of Taiwan's Police Law. Issues including duties to interrogate people at the free discretion by the police, surveillance device setup, on-line crime investigation, tailing and informants, and finger print collection cases are explored in detail, hoping to raise the normative strength of Police Law as well as preventing police power from expanding drastically and restricting individual rights in an unbalanced way.
目  次: 壹、前言:自由與安全的動態平衡
貳、傳統德國警察法學之特色
一、危害防止
二、區分警察(行政)法與刑事法
三、區分情治機關(任務)與警察機關(任務)
四、權限的法律明確性
參、德國現代警察法學的變革
一、警察任務與職權之擴大
二、警察法與刑事法的模糊界限(重疊)
三、重新整建警察機關、情治(報)機關與國防機關
四、集中(中央)化的傾向
五、歐盟化
六、民營化
七、在地化(社區化)
八、小結
肆、德國法學及實務之因應與反省
一、提高警察干預門檻
二、分離策略
三、程序保障策略
四、小結
伍、我國警察法之演變及檢討
一、任意盤查
二、架設監視器
三、線上追緝與陷害教唆
四、跟監與線民
五、採按指紋
六、結論:資訊權的膨脹
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
林明鏘,由防止危害到危險預防:由德國警察任務與權限之嬗變檢討我國之警察法制,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第 39 卷 第 4 期,167-212 頁,2010年12月。
返回功能列