法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
行政專業的規範制衡-從中科三期環評案反省環境影響評估法的規範拘束功能
文獻引用
編著譯者: 黃舒芃
出版日期: 2013.03
刊登出處: 台灣/臺灣民主季刊第 10 卷 第 1 期/121-154 頁
頁  數: 25 點閱次數: 1057
下載點數: 100 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 黃舒芃
關 鍵 詞: 環境影響評估判斷餘地有條件通過預防原則授權
中文摘要: 在「中科三期環評案」中,法院首次撤銷行政主管機關的環評審查結論。不論在法院的論證內容上,或者從環保署在法院判決之後公然反擊的態度看來,本案始終都呈現出一種「法律」與「(環評)專業」兩相對立的局面。不過,相對於法律與專業的對立,環保署以「有條件通過」的方式,作成中科三期環評審查結論,究竟如何與環境影響評估法的規範意旨相牴觸,恐怕是環保署更直接的違法證據,也是更值得吾人深思的法制問題。有鑑於此,本文旨在指出:若從環境影響評估法清楚區分「第一階段」與「第二階段」兩種不同性質的環境影響評估程序,並且意欲藉由賦予行政機關更多認定空間(判斷開發行為是否「對環境有重大影響之虞」),徹底落實二階環評的制度設計看來,環保署在環境影響評估法施行細則中,創設母法所無之所謂「有條件通過」的行政處分選項,恐已在扭曲環境影響評估法制度原意的前提下,逾越環境影響評估法要求行政主管機關落實二階環評制度功能的任務授權,進而牴觸環境影響評估法的規範意旨。就這個意義而言,中科三期環評審查的爭議,並不能被化約為「法院應對行政專業展現多少尊重或退讓」的問題,而是更直接牽涉到行政機關(環保署)對於環境影響評估法之理解程度與詮釋能力的問題。
英文關鍵詞: environmental impact assessmentadministrative discretionconditional approvalprecautionary principledelegation
英文摘要: The Supreme Administrative Court overruled the decision of the Department of Environmental Protection on the Environmental Impact Assessment in the case of the Central Taiwan Science Park III. This court decision has not only intensified the tension between the administrative and the judicial branches, but also triggered numerous debates regarding the normative control of the administrative professional decisions. While many discussions maintained that the decision of the Department of Environmental Protection in this case is illegal just because it exceeds the administrative discretionary power, this essay argues that, in creating in the Enforcement Rules of Environmental Impact Assessment Act the alternative of “conditional approval,” the Department of Environmental Protection has failed to notice that, according to the legislative distinction between the so-called “first” and “second” phase of Environmental Impact Assessment, the alternative of “conditional approval” runs counter to the precautionary principle which is embedded in the legislative purpose and thereby conflicts with the legislative delegation. From this point of view, the case of the Central Taiwan Science Park III not only reflects the potential conflict between law and science, but rather illustrates the crisis of the rule of law in Taiwan.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、判斷餘地中的司法審查—法院在中科三期環評案中的論證模式
參、被忽略的環境影響評估法:中科三期環評案的缺憾與啟示
肆、結語:訴求一套回歸環境影響評估法意旨的環評政策與司法審查
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
黃舒芃,行政專業的規範制衡-從中科三期環評案反省環境影響評估法的規範拘束功能,臺灣民主季刊,第10卷第1期,121-154頁,2013年03月。
返回功能列