法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 一次性醫療器材重消之契約責任-告知就沒責任嗎?(The Liability of contract in Reusing of Single Use Medical Instruments after Disinfection:Is There no Responsibility with Disclosure?)
編著譯者: 侯英泠
出版日期: 2020.04
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 42 期
頁  數: 0 點閱次數: 258
關 鍵 詞: 一次性醫療器材告知說明感染感控義務醫療契約
中文摘要: 一次性醫療器材重消使用,是否可以透過告知及減輕醫療機構責任?依契約自由原則,並非不可想像,但該醫療器材重消使用須屬於當時可接受之醫療慣行,不至於牴觸醫療常規,則其使用可屬於替代性醫療器材,基於誠信原則,應充分告知病患可替代之醫療器材相關風險,始可減輕契約責任。
英文關鍵詞: reusing of single use medical instruments after disinfectiondisclosureinfectionduty of infection controlmedical contract
英文摘要: Could the liability of the medical institutions be released after ..disclosure by reusing the single use medical instruments after disinfection? It might not be unimaginable according to the principle of contract freedom, but must belong to an acceptable medical costume in that time. Besides, the medical guideline shall not be broken. Reusing the disinfected medical instruments which is single use is available in this respect. According to good faith principle, the patient should be notified the risks about alternative medical instruments. Then the contract liability could be reduced.
目  次: 壹、案例事實
貳、爭點分析
參、問題解析
一、醫療契約之目的與內容
二、醫材使用於醫療契約之債務性質
三、重消醫療器材感控義務之性質
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
    相關函釋:
      相關論著:
        返回功能列