法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 與惡的距離:專科護理師當醫師用(The Distance from Evil: Taking Nurse Practitioner As Physician)
編著譯者: 邱慧洳
出版日期: 2020.05
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 43 期 /148-152 頁
頁  數: 5 點閱次數: 367
關 鍵 詞: 共同正犯執業範圍密醫罪專科護理師醫師法第 28 條規定
中文摘要: 診斷、處方、手術、施行麻醉與病歷記載等,均為醫師必須親自執行之核心醫療行為,不具醫師資格者如執行核心醫療行為,則違反醫師法第 28 條規定而成立密醫罪。本文擬介紹一則專科護理師於醫院院長授權下為病人開立藥物處方,而專科護理師與醫院院長均成立密醫罪之判決。本件之爭點涉及密醫罪、醫療業務、專科護理師之業務範圍、共同正犯等概念,本文擬藉此判決探究之。
英文關鍵詞: coconspiratorscope of practicethe crime of the fake doctornurse practitionerparagraph 28 of Physicians Act
英文摘要: It is the core of medical treatments to diagnose, to give prescriptions, to perform surgeries, to have anesthetic and to make medical records. It would be the crime of the fake doctor according to paragraph 28 of Physicians Act if the agency for the above medical treatments had no medical license. A judgement about the crime of the fake doctor would be introduced in this essay, in which a nurse practitioner gave prescriptions to patients under the authority of the director of the hospital and both of them committed the crime of fake doctor. The legal issue like the concepts of the crime of the fake doctor, medical practice, the scope of practice of nurse practitioner and co-conspirator, ect. would be discussed in this essay.
目  次: 壹、案例事實
貳、爭點
參、解析
一、醫師法第 28 條規定(密醫罪)與醫療業務之內涵
二、密醫罪之共同正犯
三、專科護理師之業務範圍
肆、結論
一、爭點一:乙專科護理師是否成立密醫罪?
二、爭點二:甲醫師兼院長是否成立密醫罪?
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列