法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 逾越醫療行為範圍之法律責任(二):解構密醫罪之成立要件(The Legal Responsibilities of the Surpassing the Scope of Medical Medical Behavior (II):The Deconstructing the Requirements for the Crime of Fake Doctor)
編著譯者: 王服清
出版日期: 2021.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 51 期 /122-135 頁
頁  數: 9 點閱次數: 384
下載點數: 36 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 王服清
關 鍵 詞: 密醫逾越醫療行為醫療行為醫療業務醫療輔助人員
中文摘要: 未具合法醫師資格而執行醫療行為(業務)者,固然成立醫師法第 28 條之密醫罪;然而,醫師如係「逾越醫療行為(業務)範圍」,則不一定構成密醫罪。同理,未取得醫師及醫事專門職業人員資格者,如未依醫師指示,其執行醫療(輔助)行為(業務),始成立密醫罪;否則,應依各該醫事專門職業法規規定,論以處罰。
英文關鍵詞: fake doctorsurpassing the scope of medical medical behaviormedical behaviormedical businessmedical assistant
英文摘要: Those who are not legally qualified as medical practitioners (businesses) will certainly establish the fake doctor crime under Article 28 of the Doctors' Law. However, a doctor's "surpassing the scope of medical practice (business)" does not necessarily constitute a fake doctor crime. Similarly, those who have not obtained the qualifications of doctors and professional medical professionals fail to follow the instructions of the doctors, and they perform the medical (auxiliary) behavior (business) to establish the crime of fake doctor. Otherwise, they shall be punished according to the regulations of the professional medical regulations.
目  次: 壹、案例
貳、案例爭點
參、解析
一、認識醫師法第 28 條之密醫罪
二、醫師法第 25 條之懲戒罰
肆、結論
一、就中醫師乙而言
二、就未具物理治療人員資格之丙而言
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
    返回功能列