法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 刑事醫療鑑定報告應有之證據調查方法(Necessary Evidence Investigation Methods in Criminal Medical Appraisal Report)
編著譯者: 吳景欽
出版日期: 2021.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 51 期 /136-143 頁
頁  數: 5 點閱次數: 351
下載點數: 20 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳景欽
關 鍵 詞: 專家證人傳聞證據機關鑑定醫事審議委員會鑑定人
中文摘要: 鑑定人雖屬人的證據方法,但於鑑定報告的調查程序,尤其是機關鑑定,卻常以鑑定報告書屬可信性文書,認其係傳聞之例外而具有證據能力。若對鑑定報告有疑問,也是由法院以函詢鑑定機關的方式為解決,此既是書面審理,且如醫療鑑定之類,係具有高度專業與複雜的事務,如此的審理方式能否為法官所理解與掌握,實屬有疑。又在當事人無從詰問,被告亦無從自行委請鑑定下,更是對訴訟權的侵害,故是未來必須加以改革之處。
英文關鍵詞: expert witnesshearsay evidenceagency appraisalMedical Review Committeeappraiser
英文摘要: Although an expert is a personal method of evidence, in the process of investigating an expert’s report, especially in an agency’s appraisal, he often regards his expert’s report as a credibility document, which is an exception to hearsay, and has the ability to prove. If there is a question about the appraisal report, the court will also resolve it by inquiring the appraisal agency by letter. This is not only a written trial, but also involves highly professional and complicated matters such as medical appraisal. Can such a trial method be handled by a judge? In addition, when the parties have no way to cross-examine and the defendant cannot request an appraisal on their own, it is an infringement of the right of litigation, which must be reformed in the future.
目  次: 壹、案例
貳、爭點
參、解析
一、機關鑑定的調查程序
二、私的鑑定
肆、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
    返回功能列