法學期刊.
  • 社群分享
論著名稱: 保健食品廣告的憲法審查問題-先前釋憲實務見解的爭點思考(Judicial Review over the “Advertisement for Healthy Foods”: Discussions on Related Judicial Interpretations)
編著譯者: 吳信華
出版日期: 2022.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦醫事法報告第 63 期 /20-35 頁
頁  數: 10 點閱次數: 183
下載點數: 40 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 吳信華
關 鍵 詞: 法律明確性保健食品廣告食品安全衛生管理法誇大不實醫療效能
中文摘要: 「保健食品」現歸類於一般食品,受「食品安全衛生管理法」之規制。食安法對食品定有諸多限制,本文所探究者係「廣告」的部分,主要即第 28 條第 1 項及第 2 項:「食品、食品加物、食品用洗潔劑及經中央主管機關公告之食品器具、食品容器或包裝,其標示、宣傳或廣告,不得有不實、誇張或易生誤解之情形。食品不得為醫療效能之標示、宣傳或廣告。」在主軸上即分析本規定(及其子法)之相關憲法爭點,包含所涉及的基本權利以及欲為合憲性審查時之「審查基準」;而在論述上就大法官解釋中對相關廣告規範所曾表示之見解為結合印證,亦一併探究「裁判憲法審查」制度施行後所可能涉及的問題。
英文關鍵詞: legal clarityadvertisement for healthy foodsFood Safety and Hygiene Management Actexaggeration and falsemedical efficacy
英文摘要: The so-called "healthy food" is defined by the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation as "general food" which does not have any medical effect. This article aims to discuss Sections 1 and 2, Article 28 of the Act which provides that "the labeling, promotion or advertisement of foods, food additives, food cleansers and food utensils, food containers or packaging designated by the central competent authority in a public announcement shall not be false, exaggerated or misleading" and "foods shall not be so labeled, promoted or advertised as having medical efficacy" in connection to Constitutional debates over concerned fundamental rights and the benchmark of judicial review. It shall elaborate related Judicial Interpretations as well as discern possible problems under the system of judicial review over court decisions.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、合憲性審查的相關問題
一、所涉及的基本權利
二、本案的「審查基準」
參、「裁判憲法訴願」生效後的觀察
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
    相關論著:
      返回功能列