| 關 鍵 詞： |
閱覽試卷；參考答案；律師考試；正當程序 |
| 中文摘要： |
現行典試法規定僅允許應考人於榜示後申請閱覽試卷，同時限制申請提供參考答案，並明文排除其他法律適用的規定，迭遭學者批評，認為恐有違憲疑義。本文從美國律師考試閱覽試卷及公布參考答案相關案例與規定的介紹出發，希望開闊此一問題討論的視野，不再侷限在維護應考人權利、考試程序公平等目的，而能將在美國被多數州所肯認，幫助應考人學習、協助其準備下次考試的目標，納入我國未來修法參考。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
inspection of answer sheets；sample answer；bar exam；due process |
| 英文摘要： |
The current Examination Affairs Act （EAA） permits examinees to inspect their answer sheets after the exam result is made public, while at the same time prohibits them from requesting sample answers. The above-mentioned provision draws heavy criticism from scholars who claim it is unconstitutional. By introducing the rules and cases regarding the inspection of exam answer sheets and the release of sample answers of U.S. bar exams, this article wishes to broaden the discussion of this topic, not limiting itself to the traditional issues of the protection of the procedural rights of the examinees or the maintenance of the fairness of the exams. The article argues that assisting failing examinees in learning about their examination strengths and weaknesses, and improving preparation for the next exam should be an important goal when the EAA is amended in the future.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、美國律師考試閱覽試卷及公布參考答案法制
一、依據聯邦或州憲法規定主張限制公開違憲
二、依據各州法院規則或法律規定請求公開
（一）州法院直接本於監督權責要求公開（提供）考試資訊
（二）各州規定整理
參、美國制度的啟示：代結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|