| 關 鍵 詞： |
訴權；濫訴制裁；審判權衝突；程序選擇權 |
| 中文摘要： |
2020 及 2021 年開始對民事訴訟法為重大修正，進行 21 世紀本土化民事訴訟制度之第 2 波改革。首先係保障人民之訴權，於其起訴欠缺當事人適格或權利保護要件而可以補正之情形，要求審判長定期先命補正，保障當事人受本案判決而終局解決紛爭之訴訟權。其次是儘速確定審判權之歸屬。除容許當事人合意選擇由普通法院裁判之外，就審判權之消極衝突，改由各審判權之終審法院予以指定，而不必經大法官解釋，以明快解決法院間審判權之爭議。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Right of Action；Punishment of Vexatious Actions；Conflict of Jurisdiction；Right to Procedure Options |
| 英文摘要： |
In 2020 and 2021, a major revision of the Civil Procedure Law was introduced, and the second wave of reform of the localized Civil Procedure Law in the 21st century has been carried out. The first thing is to protect the right of action. In order to protect the right of access to the courts and to ensure that people can receive judgement to finally resolve disputes, Civil Procedure Law requires the presiding judge to give a chance to amend in a period of time when lacking of quality of party or interests of litigation. The second thing is to ascertain the jurisdiction in order to quickly resolve the conflict of jurisdiction between different system of courts. In addition to allowing the parties to consensually choose to be adjudicated by the ordinary courts, the Court of Final Appeal of each jurisdiction should assign jurisdiction to confirm which court has jurisdiction instead of explaining by the Chancellor when the negative conflict of jurisdiction happens.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、緒言
貳、訴訟要件之重新定位：訴權保障及濫訴制裁
一、訴權保障之明文化
二、濫訴制裁之明確化
參、審判權之儘速確定：終審法院指定及當事人合意選定
一、終審法院替代大法官之審判權決定
二、審判權有無之迅速確定原則
肆、結語
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|