法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
最高限額抵押權擔保債權範圍之爭議問題研析(A Study on the Disputes of the Scope of Claims Secured by Line of Credit Mortgages)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 謝在全陳旺聖
出版日期: 2023.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 332 期/118-138 頁
頁  數: 21 (授權者自訂售價) 點閱次數: 793
下載點數: 168 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 陳旺聖
關 鍵 詞: 最高限額抵押權最高限額抵押權擔保債權範圍一定法律關係實質限定性客觀明確性
中文摘要: 最高限額抵押權之事物本質為擔保不特定債權,且基於民法第 881 條之 1 規定否定概括最高限額抵押權設定之意旨,對於擔保債權範圍所須約定之「一定法律關係」,必須具有實質限定性及客觀明確性,始足當之。又一定法律關係如已合法約定,並經辦理登記者,則該法律關係交易過程中所生債權,例如自約定之一定法律關係所生債權之利息、遲延利息、違約金,無待登記,亦當然為最高限額抵押權擔保債權之範圍,惟應受最高限額之限制而已。
英文關鍵詞: Line of Credit MortgagesScope of Claims Secured by Line of Credit MortgagesSpecific Legal RelationshipsSubstantial LimitationObjective Clarity
英文摘要: The essence thing of the Line of Credit Mortgages is to guarantee unspecified claims, and based on the intention of Article 881-1 of the Civil Code to negate the Unlimited Line of Credit Mortgages. "Specific legal relationships" must be agreed on the scope of claims secured, it must be substantial limitation and objective clarity. In addition, if specific legal relationships have been legally agreed and registered, the generated during the transaction of the legal relationship, such as the interests, deferred interests, and liquidated damages of generated from the agreed specific legal relationship, do not need to be another registered, which is certainly contained in the Line of Credit Mortgages, but also should be limited by the maximum limit.
目  次: 壹、序言
貳、最高限額抵押權擔保債權範圍約定之合法性
參、約定之利息及違約金應否登記,始為擔保範圍
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
謝在全、陳旺聖,最高限額抵押權擔保債權範圍之爭議問題研析,月旦法學雜誌,第 332 期,118-138 頁,2023年01月。
返回功能列