法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
釋字第 785 號解釋與公務員救濟事件體系重構-由公務員不服「再申訴」決定提起行政訴訟相關問題談起
文獻引用
編著譯者: 林三欽
出版日期: 2023.03
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 334 期/44-57 頁
頁  數: 15 點閱次數: 599
下載點數: 60 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 林三欽
關 鍵 詞: 釋字第785號解釋特別權力關係行政處分不服再申訴決定之救濟三階段判斷模式顯屬輕微之侵害權利保護必要性
中文摘要: 公務人員保障法原始結構偏向二分法,唯有不服行政處分而提起復審之事件,後續得提起行政訴訟。但釋字第 785 號解釋突破此一陳舊不合理的架構,而指出人事行政上之非行政處分若有違法侵害公務員之情事,當事人不服再申訴決定時,得對之提起行政訴訟。此一合憲解釋,將保障法救濟體系由二分法重構為三分法,保訓會與行政法院後續如何落實此一解釋之意旨,值得關注。
英文關鍵詞: Interpretation No. 785Special Authority RelationshipsAdministrative DispositionAdministrative Suit after the Refusal of Second AppealThree-phases ClassificationInfringement that is Obviously Minorthe Need for Legal Protection
英文摘要: The original structure of the Civil Service Protection Act is dualistic, and an administrative litigation can only be filed after a reexamination with an administrative disposition.
However, Judicial Yuan's Interpretation No. 785 breaks through this obsolete structure, and points out that if a non-administrative disposition action in personnel administration is unlawful against a civil servant, the party may file an administrative litigation if he/she does not agree with the re-appeal decision.
This J.Y. interpretation No. 785 reconstructs the relief system of the Civil Service Protection Act from a dichotomy to a trichotomy, and it is worth paying attention to how the Civil Service Protection & Training Commission and the Administrative Courts will implement this interpretation in the future.
目  次: 壹、序說
貳、貫穿釋字第 785 號解釋前後的發展脈絡:賦予當事人完整充分的救濟管道
參、不服再申訴決定之行政訴訟相關問題
肆、結語
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
林三欽,釋字第 785 號解釋與公務員救濟事件體系重構-由公務員不服「再申訴」決定提起行政訴訟相關問題談起,月旦法學雜誌,第 334 期,44-57 頁,2023年03月。
返回功能列