關 鍵 詞: |
入境團聚;婚姻與家庭保障;移民法 |
中文摘要: |
移民法向來都是法學研究與實務的邊陲地帶,跨國婚姻與家庭甚難獲得司法實務與法學研究的關注,特別是在疫情影響下的入境管制更被理解為有效對抗疫情的不二法門。更有甚者,在夾雜國家與國族好惡下,使得外籍或陸籍的配偶與子女的入境團聚更顯複雜與困難。本文之作,旨在提醒:入出國及移民法制並非法外之地,其規範手段始終仍須符合法治國原則的要求。
|
英文關鍵詞: |
Family Reunion;the Protection of Marriage and Family;Immigration Act |
英文摘要: |
Immigration law has always been in the peripheral area of legal research and practice. Issues related to transnational marriages and families have rarely received the attention from judicial practice and legal research. In particular, the border control measures reinforced under the influence of the COVID-19 are viewed as the only effective measure to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Furthermore, under the influence of the national preference and ethnic bias towards different nations, the family reunion with foreign national or Mainland China spouses and children becomes more and more complicated and difficult. This article serves as a reminder that issues related to immigration are not unregulated in that the Immigration Act must comply with the principle of rule of law.
|
目 次: |
壹、問題提出與論述步驟 貳、國籍取得與所謂國籍選擇說的謬誤 參、入境權利之現行規範基礎 一、依身分有別之入境權利 二、無戶籍國民之入境權利 三、大陸地區與港澳地區人民 四、小結:只看身分不看實質關聯的入境保障 肆、入境權利及其限制之合憲性事由 一、居留鞏固下的入境權利:依實質關聯所界定之基本權地位 (一)初次入境者 (二)已具有居留或團聚地位者 二、婚姻與家庭團聚之基本權利意涵 (一)德國憲法裁判實務與學理的立場 (二)我國釋憲實務之立場 (三)本文立場 三、行政法上「許可」的憲法意涵 四、疫情考量下的合憲空間? (一)形式合憲性 (二)實質合憲性 伍、結論
|
相關法條: |
|
相關判解: |
|
相關函釋: |
|
相關論著: |
|