| 關 鍵 詞： |
土地總登記；土地所有權第一次登記；無主土地；塗銷登記；物上請求權；消滅時效；誠信原則 |
| 中文摘要： |
本文精選收錄灣高等法院 111 年度重上更一字第 86 號判決、臺灣高等法院臺中分院 110 年度上字第 394 號判決及最高法院 112 年度台上字第 639 號判決四件民事判決，並選擇該最新近之最高法院 112 年度台上字第 639 號判決，塗銷所有權移轉登記等事件為中心予以解說。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
General Registration of Land；Initial Registration of Land Ownership；Ownerless Land；Registration of Cancellation；Petition Right on Property；Negative Prescription；Principle of Good Faith |
| 英文摘要： |
This article focuses on the Supreme Court 112 Tai Shang Zi No. 639 civil judgment and explains its content. The judgment in this case pointed out that the land that was originally privately owned during the Japanese rule period was designated as a river area, and its ownership registration was cancelled. After the recovery of Taiwan, the general registration of land has not been completed in accordance with the law, but when the land is restored to its original state, before the registration authority registers the land as national property, it should still carry out the procedure of public notice of land deemed to be ownerless land as stipulated in Article 57 of the Land Law, so that the original landowners can exercise their rights in a timely manner. Therefore, this article focuses on two main points: firstly, to explain the difference between the general registration of land and the initial registration of land ownership; and secondly, when the original landowner exercise the petition right on property and request the cancellation of the registration of the ownership of national land, the national land administration authority argues that the statute of negative prescription has expired, and whether this violates the principle of good faith.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、導讀
一、前言
二、最高法院 112 年度台上字第 639 號民事判決解說
（一）事實概要
（二）判決意旨
（三）判決解說
貳、裁判整理
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|