法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
食安衛生、風險管理與中央地方權限劃分-評憲法法庭 111 年憲判字第 6 號判決(Food Safety and Sanitation, Risk Management, and Distribution of Power between Central and Local Government: A Review on Taiwan Constitutional Court Judgment 111-Hsien-Pan-6 (2022))
文獻引用
編著譯者: 張志偉
出版日期: 2023.06
刊登出處: 台灣/公法研究第 5 期/85-110 頁
頁  數: 16 點閱次數: 388
下載點數: 64 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張志偉
關 鍵 詞: 單一國地方自治風險管理健康權
中文摘要: 在中央訂定進口肉品殘留動物用藥的安全容許量之後,是否仍有各地方自治團體另訂自治條例的空間,憲法法庭 111 年憲判字第 6 號判決已給出答案。為處理此一中央地方權限劃分之爭議,本文擬先檢視本憲法判決的受理論據與判決脈絡,以掌握大法官多數意見對此之立場;再就本判決所持論據,從憲法與地方自治法角度,分析其審查模式與論證理由。最末則就本判決之後,地方自治立法可能的空間再予分析。
英文關鍵詞: unitary statelocal self-governmentrisk managementright to health
英文摘要: Taiwan Constitutional Court has issued its decision on the issue whether local self-governments may still have self-government ordinances on the same issue after the central government announces the acceptable intake of veterinary drug residue in imported meats. To analyze this issue on the distribution of power between central and local government, this article first reviews the decision of the Court related to why it accepted to hear this case and the context of the Court decision as an effort to understand the position took by the majority opinion. Next, the article analyzes the standard of the constitutional review used by the Court and the rationale provided by the Court from the perspectives of constitutional law and local self-governance laws. At the end, the article analyzes whether there’re any possibilities to have self-government ordinances on the same issue after thisCourt decision.
目  次: 壹、問題提出與論述步驟
貳、受理論據與判決脈絡
一、程序受理與不受理
二、判決脈絡
參、中央地方權限爭議-食安自治條例的憲法空間
一、權限劃分之審查模式
二、本判決審查模式的再檢視
三、食安自治條例作為上乘條例
四、基本權利審查
肆、憲法判決之後-代結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
張志偉,食安衛生、風險管理與中央地方權限劃分-評憲法法庭 111 年憲判字第 6 號判決,公法研究,第 5 期,85-110 頁,2023年06月。
返回功能列