法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
營業秘密法與刑事訴訟法之交錯-以證據與偵查為中心(The Cross Between Trade Secret Act and Criminal Procedure Code: Centered on Evidence and Prosecutorial Investigation)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 張明偉
出版日期: 2023.01
刊登出處: 台灣/臺灣科技法學叢刊第 5 期/151-177 頁
頁  數: 27 點閱次數: 302
下載點數: 108 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 財團法人資訊工業策進會
關 鍵 詞: 營業秘密刑事訴訟證據偵查
中文摘要: 營業秘密法涉及不少數位證據爭議,惟現行法制不僅欠缺驗真程序,亦缺乏完整的傳聞規範。又雖營業秘密法已新增偵查保密令之制度,惟關於為何法制中有必要授予檢察官限制言論自由的概括權限、甚至進一步增訂此種類型妨害司法罪,法理上並非無疑。在憲法保障言論自由權之架構下,由檢察官逕行限制言論自由,應有違正當法律程序。
英文關鍵詞: Trade SecretCriminal ProcedureEvidenceProsecutorial Investigation
英文摘要: The Trade Secret Act involves some disputes of digital evidence, however, the current legal system lacks not only rules of authentication but complete hearsay jurisprudence. Although the Trade Secret Act has already added the Prosecutorial Secret Order System, why is it necessary to generally authorize the public prosecutor to restrict the freedom of speech as well as to create the accompanying offense of obstruction of the Prosecutorial Secret Order remains questionable in theory. Under the framework of the constitutional protection of the right of free speech, permitting the public prosecutor to restrict the right of free speech without warrant violates the concept of due process.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、營業秘密犯罪數位證據同一性的驗真程序
參、營業秘密犯罪數位證據傳聞法則適用議題
肆、偵查保密令制度
伍、偵查不公開之反省
陸、結論
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
張明偉,營業秘密法與刑事訴訟法之交錯-以證據與偵查為中心,臺灣科技法學叢刊,第 5 期,151-177 頁,2023年01月。
返回功能列