| 關 鍵 詞： |
新公共管理；公私協力；實驗教育；公辦民營；協力夥伴關係 |
| 中文摘要： |
1970 年代興起的新公共管理帶來「公私協力」模式，同時使得我國在 1990 年代開啟一連串教育改革，而體制外之教育需求—實驗教育及家長教育選擇權，開始逐步受到政府重視，並使實驗教育走向合法化。直至 2014 年立法制定實驗教育三法—公辦公營學校方式、公辦民營學校方式、非學校型態方式，更使實驗教育走向興盛化，截至 109 學年度我國已有 13 所公辦民營學校，較過去幾乎成倍數成長。公辦民營學校即為公私協力代表類型之一而本文所探討的個案學校即為實驗教育三法通過後，首次出現協力失靈的案件，惟目前公辦民營學校之協力失靈相關文獻仍不充足。據此，本文使用文件分析法，來探進行探討，並得出以下結論：代理人理論可用於解釋本次解約事件、現行政策環境與法令仍限制實驗教育、協力夥伴關係尚待建立。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
New Public Management；Public-Private Partnerships；Collaborative Partnership；Privatized School；Collaborative Partnership |
| 英文摘要： |
The trend of New Public Management in 1970s urged each government to care about demands from citizens and the quality of public service so much that Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) showed up. Likewise, education reform in Taiwan began in 1990s, so experimental education and school choice were emphasized as well. Taiwan didn’t legislate 3 laws for experimental education— public school、privatized schools and nonschool until 2014. Up to 2020, there are 13 privatized schools in Taiwan. However, due to the lack of concerned literature to discuss Collaborative Partnership between the local government and private sector, this study chose one case school that terminated by one local government and applied documentary analysis to explain possible reasons. Finally, some results present as follow: This case can be explained through agency theory, decision-making environments and modern regulations restrict experimental education and collaborative partnership needs establishing.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、文獻回顧
一、實驗教育
二、地方政府委託私人辦理公共服務（教育）
參、研究方法
肆、研究結果與討論
一、代理人問題
（一）目標與分工衝突
（二）資訊不對等
（三）契約關係
二、公私合夥風險
伍、結語與建議
一、代理人理論仍適用於個案學校與地方政府解約事由
二、政策環境與現行法令仍限制實驗教育
三、協力夥伴關係尚待建立
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|