法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
論刑事鑑定與最終爭點法則(On the Criminal Expert Witness and the Ultimate Issue Principle)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 張明偉
出版日期: 2024.01
刊登出處: 台灣/月旦法學雜誌第 344 期/143-157 頁
頁  數: 16 點閱次數: 606
下載點數: 64 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 張明偉
關 鍵 詞: 最終爭點法則鑑定人精神失常特別知識經驗
中文摘要: 依刑事訴訟法第 198 條:「鑑定人由審判長、受命法官或檢察官就下列之人選任一人或數人充之:一、就鑑定事項有特別知識經驗者。二、經政府機關委任有鑑定職務者。」規定,法院得以鑑定人協助了解證據或事實。惟關於鑑定適用之限制,現行法並未有所規範。美國法上之最終爭點法則於我國有無適用?應加探討,以免誤用導致事實認定錯誤,妨礙審判公正。
英文關鍵詞: Ultimate Issue RuleExpert WitnessMental DisorderExpertise
英文摘要: The court may employ the expert witness to realize evidence and the fact according to Article 198 of the ROC Criminal Procedure Code, providing that: “A presiding judge, commissioned judge, or public prosecutor may select one or more expert witnesses from the following: (1) A person who has special knowledge and experience concerning the matter which requires expert opinion; (2) A person who is commissioned by a public office to perform duties of an expert witness.” However, the current law does not limit the way to employ expert witness. Whether the ultimate issue rule derived from the Anglo-American system applies in the current system deserves further review so that any error in factfinding as well as criminal injustice would not result from misunderstanding of the rule.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、現行法制
參、美國專家證人最終爭點意見法則之發展
肆、最終爭點法則之檢討
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
張明偉,論刑事鑑定與最終爭點法則,月旦法學雜誌,第 344 期,143-157 頁,2024年01月。
返回功能列