| 關 鍵 詞： |
凌虐；加重結果犯；訴因；國民法官；死刑 |
| 中文摘要： |
2024 年 3 月，發生一起虐童致死案，引發社會公憤，並有人於公民平台提案，虐童致死、唯一死刑。惟就算立法通過，但在法律不溯既往原則下，也不能適用此次案件。而因從 2023 年 1 月 1 日，只要是故意犯罪因而發生死亡結果者，就必須要由國民法官參與審判，則在如此的審判模式下，有無可能使此案，以故意殺人罪論處，致出現判死之可能，就值探討。而本文為使問題聚焦，即以此時事為基礎，虛擬一個例題，並因此為分析，以能讓法律系學生了解與學習國民法官法。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
maltreat；aggravated consequences；cause of action；citizen judges；death penalty |
| 英文摘要： |
In March 2024, a case of child abuse resulting in death occurred, which caused public outrage. Some people proposed on the citizen platform that the only death penalty for child abuse resulting in death was death. However, even if the legislation is passed, it cannot be applied to this case under the principle of non-retroactivity of law. And since from January 1, 2023, as long as a person commits an intentional crime and the result is death, citizen judges must participate in the trial. Under such a trial model, is it possible for this case to be treated as intentional homicide? The possibility of a death sentence is worth exploring. In order to focus the issue, this article uses this event as a basis to create a virtual example and analyze it so that law students can understand and learn the Citizen Judges Law.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、例題及爭點
參、爭點解析
肆、結論
伍、參考文獻
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|