| 關 鍵 詞： |
憲法解釋見解變更；婚姻家庭保障；通姦罪；方法拘束；憲法訴訟 |
| 中文摘要： |
關於通姦行為是否除罪化的爭議，釋字第 554 號解釋曾認定通姦罪合憲，惟時隔近 18 年後，釋字第 791 號解釋則變更此一立場，遂引發釋憲者所為憲法解釋見解變更是否全然存乎一心，自由自在毫無拘束可言；抑或在憲法（訴訟）學理或方法論上，仍可尋得一絲實質限制？本文先是指出，憲法解釋見解變更的特殊性與其事由，並以此反思本號解釋之立論基礎；其次則是著眼於刑罰規範之基本權審查模式，以及本號解釋對於民事裁判的可能影響。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
change on the decision of constitutional interpretation；protection on marriage and family；adultery；methodological constraints；constitutional court procedure |
| 英文摘要： |
With regard to the issue of whether adultery should be decriminalized, the Constitutional Court has decided in Interpretation No. 554 that criminalizing adultery is constitutional. However, the Court changed its position in Interpretation No. 791 after 18 years. This gives rise to the question of whether the Constitutional Court may change its decision at its discretion without any boundary, and whether any substantive limitations on such change may be found from the constitutional (court procedure) jurisprudence or methodology. This article first points out the exceptional nature and reasons for any changes in Constitutional Court decisions and uses this as the base to analyze the reasoning of Interpretation No. 791. The article then focuses on the judicial review model used to review any criminal law and the possible impacts this Interpretation has on civil courts' decisions.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題提出與論述步驟
貳、釋字第 791 號解釋關於裁判見解變更的立場
一、首度處理通姦罪合憲性的釋字第 554 號解釋
二、從釋字第 554 號解釋到釋字第 791 號解釋的憲法變遷
參、憲法裁判見解變更的特殊性與事由
一、平等原則對於司法權之拘束
二、裁判見解變更的一般事由
三、憲法裁判自身拘束之原則與例外
四、釋憲者變更前解釋之界限與正當性
肆、刑罰規範之基本權審查模式再檢視
一、刑罰規範之基本權審查：行為規範與制裁規範有別
二、對於民事裁判的影響
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|