| 關 鍵 詞： |
生育自主權；消費者保護法；基因檢測；產前診斷錯誤；損害賠償 |
| 中文摘要： |
本案涉及產前基因檢測錯誤，導致孕婦產下身心障礙子女。法院認為，孕婦與檢驗機構間具消費關係，適用消費者保護法之服務無過失責任。本文從比較法上「計畫外生育」及「計畫外生命」二概念切入，分析產前診斷錯誤所涉及之法律關係、受侵害之法益及損害賠償範圍。在「計畫外生育」，父母得請求財產上及非財產上損害賠償，但子女之一般扶養費是否納入賠償範圍，仍待商榷；在「計畫外生命」，學說及實務則多否定殘障子女之損害賠償請求權。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
reproductive autonomy；Consumer Protection Act；genetic testing；prenatal misdiagnosis；damages |
| 英文摘要： |
This case involves a prenatal genetic testing error that resulted in a pregnant woman giving birth to a disabled child. The court held that there was a consumer relationship between the pregnant woman and the testing institution, and thus the no-fault liability for services under the Consumer Protection Act applied. This article analyzes the legal relationships, infringed rights, and scope of damages involved in prenatal misdiagnosis from the comparative law perspectives of “wrongful birth” and “wrongful life.” In “wrongful birth,” parents can claim both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, but whether the child’s general upkeep should be included in the compensation remains controversial. In “wrongful life,” most legal theories and practices deny the right of the disabled child to recover damages.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、案件概述
一、案件事實
二、專家意見
三、各審判決摘要
貳、判決評析
一、當事人間法律關係
二、計畫外生育：父母之損害賠償請求權
三、計畫外生命：身心障礙子女之損害賠償請求權
四、結語
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|