| 關 鍵 詞： |
具保；預防性羈押；精神障礙 |
| 中文摘要： |
刑事被告如因精神障礙，在符合刑法第 19 條第 1 項之要件下，應為無罪判決；復依刑事訴訟法第 316 條，該無罪判決視為「撤銷羈押」。問題是，若被告因其精神狀態而有危害社會安全的疑慮，刑事程序中的預防性羈押制度於此種情況並無法適用。本文借鑑美國法可對此類被告為「預防性拘留」之設計，提出相關立法建議。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
bail；preventive detention；mental disorder |
| 英文摘要： |
When a criminal defendant with a mental disorder is innocent because he meets the requirements of Article 19 of the Criminal Law. According to the provisions of Article 316 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the acquittal is deemed to be withdrawn from custody. But, if the defendant's mental status may endanger public security, there is no way for the preventive detention system to be applied in this situation.
Therefore, this article attempts to review the relevant provisions of the United States legal system for the preventive detention of defendants with mental disorders in criminal proceedings. Finally, proceeding from the perspective of comparative law, this article will propose legislative proposals in response to the lack of Taiwan criminal justice system.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題背景
貳、精神疾病被告之具保爭議
參、美國法關於精神障礙被告之刑事程序規定
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|