| 關 鍵 詞： |
民法第五百十四條之八；旅遊契約；慰撫金；非財產上損害賠償 |
| 中文摘要： |
我國民法於 1999 年增訂旅遊契約章節，以釐清法律關係，明確化旅遊營業人與遊客的權利義務。其中，民法第 514 條之 8 規定，旅客就時間之浪費得請求金錢賠償，此為旅遊契約所特有之規定。在侵權行為或債總規範之中，並未明文承認時間之浪費得作為損害賠償對象。本文以臺灣高等法院 104 年度上易字第 1115 號民事判決為引導案例，從損害性質與賠償對象出發，分析立法理由、學說、實務見解，具體化民法第 514 條之 8 所謂「時間之浪費得請求金錢賠償」的適用，以及損害賠償額計算上之問題。
旅遊契約目的在於紓解身心利益，且旅遊性質上必定伴隨旅客時間的流逝，債務不履行將會對旅客造成時間浪費之精神痛苦，而具有特殊性。民法第 514 條之 8 為「紓解身心之利益」之非財產上損害可請求慰撫金之特別規定，優先民法第 227 條之 1 適用。就賠償額之計算，現行法下以旅遊費用總額每日平均之數額為賠償金額上限，與慰撫金之功能有所衝突，應同一般慰撫金計算方式，視瑕疵程度、旅遊目的、實際上所浪費時間之長短、債務人可歸責程度及其他具體情事，斟酌決定之。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
A rticle 514-8 of the Civil Code；Travel Contracts；Consolation；Compensation for Non-Pecuniary Damages |
| 英文摘要： |
In 1999, a section on travel contracts was added to the Civil Code in order to clarify the legal relationship and the rights and obligations of tour operators and tourists. Article 514-8 of the Civil Code states that tourists can claim monetary compensation for wasted time. There is no explicit recognition of time wastage as a subject of compensation in tort or contract law. This article uses No. 1115 Civil Judgement (2015) of the Taiwan High Court as a guiding case to analyze the legislative reasons, doctrines and practical opinions from the perspective of the nature of damage and the object of compensation, and to specify the problems encountered in the application and calculation of Article 514-8 of the Civil Code.
The purpose of a travel contract is to relieve the physical and mental interests of the tourist, and the nature of travel is such that it must be accompanied by the passage of the tourist's time, and the non-fulfilment of the contract will cause mental anguish to the tourist in terms of time wasted, which is special. This article is a special provision for claiming compensation for nonpecuniary damages for “relief of physical and mental interests”, which takes precedence over Article 227-1 of the Civil Code. As regards the calculation of the amount of compensation, under the current law, the maximum amount of compensation is based on the average daily amount of the total cost of the journey, which is in conflict with the function of the compensation. It should be calculated in the same way as the general compensation, depending on the extent of the defect, the purpose of the travel, the actual length of time wasted, the responsibility of the obligor and other specific circumstances.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、案例事實：臺灣高等法院 104 年度上易字第 1115 號民事判決
一、事實經過
二、法院見解
三、小結
參、判決評釋
一、問題意識
（一）旅遊契約中「時間浪費」究屬財產上損害或非財產上損害
（二）旅遊契約中「時間浪費」的賠償客體為何
（三）非財產損害賠償是否等同慰撫金
二、旅遊契約中「時間浪費」的損害性質
（一）見解梳理
1.非財產上損害賠償
2.杌非財產上損害的財產化
（二）本文見解：非財產上損害賠償
三、旅遊契約中「時間浪費」的賠償客體
（一）見解梳理
1.時間之浪費
2.紓解身心之利益
（二）本文見解：紓解身心之利益
四、非財產上損害賠償之慰撫金性質與計算方式
（一）旅遊契約中「時間浪費」賠償之慰撫金性質
（二）現行規定悖離慰撫金之性質
五、附論：民法第五百十四條之八的競合
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|