法學期刊
  • 社群分享
論著名稱:
論國軍班隊簡章之法規屬性及其法制架構之檢討(A Research on the Legal Nature of the Military Academy Students Recruitment Regulations and a Review of Their Legal Framework)
文獻引用
編著譯者: 韓中誠
出版日期: 2025.03
刊登出處: 台灣/軍法專刊第 71 卷 第 1 期/64-88 頁
頁  數: 25 點閱次數: 272
下載點數: 100 點 銷售明細: 權利金查詢 變更售價
授 權 者: 軍法專刊社 授權者指定不分配權利金給作者)
關 鍵 詞: 國軍班隊簡章釋字第715號解釋法律保留原則授權明確性原則法律明確性原則
中文摘要: 現行針對國軍各班隊簡章之法規屬性,僅有司法院大法官曾作過解釋認屬對外發布之一般性法規範,以及國防部訴願決定認屬行政契約之相關實務見解,其餘固然有零星學說見解及相關行政法院判決對非軍事院校之簡章屬性有所審認,惟渠等研討或審查對象之一般大專校院、警大或警專招生簡章乃至公務機關招聘約聘僱人員之甄選簡章,往往因與國軍各班隊簡章本質上有所差異,以致於可參考性不高。因此,本文在此參考背景資料有限之情況下,擬試圖先從現行兵役法、軍事教育條例等之法制架構出發,經由學說見解、司法院大法官所作解釋、相關行政法院判決、國防部訴願決定等實務見解之引證,並依班隊屬性分別對照大專校院入學招生、公務人員考選錄取訓練等方式,逐步尋繹出國軍班隊簡章之法規定性。其次,就現行國軍班隊簡章之法制是否符合法律保留、授權明確性等原則進行檢討,並提出研修兵役法、陸海空軍軍官士官服役條例及志願士兵服役條例等相關修法建議,以供國防部未來進行政策與法令研修之參考。
英文關鍵詞: Military Academy Students Recruitment RegulationsJustice Yuan Interpretation No. 715Principle of Legal ReservationPrinciple of Clarity of AuthorizationPrinciple of Legal Clarity
英文摘要: Currently, regarding the legal nature of the military academy students recruitment regulations, only the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan have interpreted that they are general regulations released to the public, and the Ministry of National Defense’s appeal decisions that are considered to be an administrative contract. Although there are some scattered theories and relevant administrative court decisions that have recognized the nature of the brochures of the general colleges and universities, the police colleges and universities, and even the selection of contract employees recruited by public agencies, but they are often fundamentally different from the briefings for each squad of the National Army, so they are not very useful as a reference. Therefore, with limited reference background information, first, this article intends to start from the legal framework of the current Act of Military Service System and Military Education, etc. and cite theories and practical insights such as Interpretation by the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan, relevant administrative court judgments, administrative appeal decisions, etc., and according to the attributes of the military academy classes, we compared the admissions of colleges and universities, the selection and training of civil servants, etc., and gradually found the legal nature of the above students recruitment regulations. Secondly, whether the current legal system of the National Army military academy students recruitment regulations comply with the principles of legal reservation and authorization clarity will be reviewed and relevant suggestions for amending the law will be put forward to provide reference for the Ministry of National Defense in future policy and legal amendments.
目  次: 壹、前言
貳、國軍班隊之分類
一、升學班隊
(一)軍事學校正期班
(二)中正預校
(三)空軍二技班
(四)士官二專班
二、就業班隊
(一)志願役專業預備軍官士官班
(二)軍情局專業軍官班
(三)飛行常備軍官班
(四)志願士兵
三、其他班隊
參、國軍班隊簡章法規本質之現況分析
一、從現行法制脈絡加以尋繹
(一)法律位階
(二)法規命令位階
(三)小結
二、學說及實務見解分析
(一)學說見解
(二)實務見解
(三)小結
肆、國軍班隊簡章法制架構之檢討
一、 德國法之法律保留與授權明確性以及法律明確性原則
二、美國法之禁止授權及明確原則
三、 司法院大法官所建構之法律保留體系
四、現行法制架構之檢討
(一)法律保留及授權明確性原則之檢視
(二)法律明確性原則之檢視
伍、結論與建議
一、針對升學班隊簡章部分
二、針對就業班隊簡章部分
相關法條:
相關判解:
相關函釋:
相關論著:
韓中誠,論國軍班隊簡章之法規屬性及其法制架構之檢討,軍法專刊,第71卷第1期,64-88頁,2025年03月。
返回功能列