| 關 鍵 詞： |
行政執行；聲明異議；不得聲明不服；行政實效性；訴訟權之保障；停止執行；行政處分；事實行為 |
| 中文摘要： |
「行政執行貴在迅速」是行政法學界、實務作業與法院裁判所公認之法則，旨在能早日達成執行名義所欲實現之行政目的，避免法律關係延宕過久，造成法的不安定性。行政院於立法院上一屆期函請審議之 110 年版行政執行法修正草案雖因屆期不連續而功敗垂成，但其第 11 條第 3 項透過增訂不得聲明不服之方式，希冀提高行政執行之效能。本文認為此兩者之間不僅不具有實質關聯性，更無正當性地限制人民受憲法保障之訴訟權。該修正草案版本若欲再次函請立法院審議，宜再三思！
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
administrative enforcement；objection (statement of dissent)；prohibition of appeal；administrative effectiveness；protection of the right to litigation；suspension of execution；administrative act；factual act |
| 英文摘要： |
The principle that ‘administrative enforcement values swiftness’ is a widely recognized tenet in administrative law, both in academic discourse and judicial practice. Its aim is to realize the administrative objectives embodied in enforceable titles as promptly as possible, thereby avoiding prolonged legal entanglements and ensuring legal certainty. Although the 2021 draft amendment to the Administrative Enforcement Act, submitted by the Executive Yuan to the Legislative Yuan during the previous session, ultimately failed due to the discontinuity of the legislative term, Article 11, Paragraph 3 of the draft proposed to enhance the effectiveness of administrative enforcement by introducing a provision that would preclude any objections or appeals. This article contends that there is no substantive link between administrative efficiency and the denial of the right to appeal, and that such a restriction unjustifiably infringes upon the constitutionally protected right to judicial remedy. If this version of the amendment is to be reintroduced to the Legislative Yuan for deliberation, it must be approached with the utmost caution.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、問題之提出
貳、行政執行行為可爭訟性之制度變遷
一、行政訴訟程序否定期
二、行政訴訟程序肯定期
參、110 年版行政執行法修正草案之重構
一、「有條件聲明不服」模式之導入
二、修正之目的：提高行政執行之效能
肆、修正草案關於行政執行行為權利救濟規定之評析
一、目的與手段欠缺關聯性
二、提高行政執行效能權衡因素之錯置
伍、結論與展望
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|