| 關 鍵 詞： |
借牌投標；借牌陪標；不良廠商；採購公報 |
| 中文摘要： |
現行政府採購法對於借牌行為，雖有明文規範刑事與行政責任，但因為立法之初未通盤整體考慮，對於「借牌參與投標」（借牌投標）與「找無得標意願廠商陪同投標」（借牌陪標）兩種類型行為，未詳細加以區分，造成司法實務的判斷屢屢發生爭議。行政停權責任上，借牌陪標可能被視同借牌投標，實乃曲解法律要件的適用。最高法院刑事庭或最高行政法院實務，對借牌行為的定義，無論從當初立法背景及文義解釋，似有過度擴張解釋之情形。關於借牌停權之規定，即採購法第 101 條第 1 項第 1 款或 2 款之情形，應限於借牌投標類型，若在未修法情況，應重新檢視法條之適用而排除陪標類型。為避免類似爭議一再重演，根本解決之道，應整體配套修法，一勞永逸地解決借牌陪標與借牌投標所產生之爭議。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
License Borrowing for Bidding；License Borrowing for Accompanying Bids；Disqualified Vendors；Government Procurement Bulletin |
| 英文摘要： |
Although the current Government Procurement Act explicitly stipulates criminal and administrative liabilities for license borrowing, the law was not comprehensively considered during its initial legislation process. As a result, it fails to clearly distinguish between two types of conduct: (i) License Borrowing for Bidding - where a company without bidding qualifications uses another company's license to participate in the bid; and (ii) License Borrowing for Accompanying Bids - where a company with no intention of winning the bid is invited to participate in the bid. This lack of distinction has led to frequent controversies in judicial practice. In terms of administrative disqualification sanctions, License Borrowing for Accompanying Bids is often mistakenly treated as License Borrowing for Bidding, which misapplies the legal criteria. Judicial interpretations by the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court appear to excessively broaden the definition of license borrowing, both from the perspectives of legislative intent and textual interpretation. According to Article 101, Paragraph 1, Subparagraphs 1 or 2 of the Government Procurement Act, disqualification penalties should apply only to License Borrowing for Bidding. Without legislative amendments, the law should be reinterpreted to exclude License Borrowing for Accompanying Bids from such penalties. To prevent recurring disputes, a comprehensive legislative reform is necessary. This would definitively resolve the controversies surrounding both types of license borrowing behavior.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、引言
貳、借牌之刑事責任與行政停權的實務沿革
參、借牌之刑事責任與行政停權的法律效果
肆、結語：修法解決借牌類型之刑事及停權要件爭議
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|