| 關 鍵 詞： |
工作權；心理師 |
| 中文摘要： |
相較於醫師、護理師來說，心理師是一個較晚期規範的專門職業，隨著心理諮商的重要性，2001 年才出現心理師法。心理師作為一種專門職業在考選資格限定上，相比其他專門職業更為嚴格，因為依據心理師法第 2 條規定，必須是心理研究所主修臨床或諮商心理，並經實習至少一年成績及格，得有碩士以上學位者，得應臨床心理師或諮商心理師考試。其他專門職業技術人員則多需相關科系畢業及格，所以在學歷資格上面就有更嚴格的規範。本文打算從心理師目前執業與法規上的困境提起，就憲法中關於工作權規範來做說明。並且進一步提出心理師法關於心理師業務的解釋方向。
|
| 英文摘要： |
Psychology is a relatively late-regulated profession. How should we ensure the scope of practice for psychologists while avoiding overly broad regulations? Constitutional restrictions on occupational freedom follow the so-called three-stage theory. Subjective restrictions on occupational freedom refer to the professional competencies or qualifications that individuals must possess to engage in specific professions, which can be acquired through training—such as knowledge, degrees, or physical abilities. Legislators seeking to impose such restrictions must demonstrate the existence of significant public interest. The establishment of specialized professions constitutes one form of subjective restriction. Another issue to address is how to define the scope of a psychologist’s practice. Crucially, what distinguishes their work from ordinary conversation? Ensuring their professional rights is also a matter of concern.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、作為新的專門職業技術人員的心理師
參、憲法中工作權的保障與限制
一、職業自由的三階段限制
二、專門職業技術人員的形塑
肆、職業的劃分的問題
一、專門職業的執業範圍
二、其他基本權的衝突
伍、心理師的核心業務
陸、結語
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|