| 關 鍵 詞： |
蒙特婁公約；民用航空法；航空旅客運送人責任；立法形式；制度內容 |
| 中文摘要： |
蒙特婁公約作為最新之統一國際航空運送規則，已有一百三十三個國家簽署，其對於國際航空運送人民事責任之規制以及各國航空運送人民事責任法制勢必有重大影響。本文從蒙特婁公約之規定展開，進而全面檢討我國民用航空法之航空旅客運送人民事責任法制，就立法形式以及制度內容二方面加以檢討並提出建議。立法形式方面，有航空旅客人民事責任法制體系割裂之缺失，建議將民用航空運送法單獨立法，使航空私法之體系完整。制度內容方面，我國航空運送人民事責任法制長久以來變動不大，制度內容不甚現代化，建議參酌蒙特婁公約修正航空旅客運送人民事責任之相關規定。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
The Montreal Convention；The Civil Aviation Act；Liability of Air Carriers for Passenger Transportation；Legislative form；Substantive Content |
| 英文摘要： |
As the most recent unified international regime governing air carriage, the Montreal Convention has already been ratified by 133 states. Its regulation of the civil liability of international air carriers has had, and will continue to have, a profound impact on national regimes governing the civil liability of air carriers. This article begins with an examination of the provisions of the Montreal Convention, and proceeds to conduct a comprehensive review of Taiwan’s Civil Aviation Act as it relates to the civil liability of air carriers for passenger transportation. The discussion addresses both the legislative form and the substantive content of the current regime, offering recommendations in each respect. From the perspective of legislative form, Taiwan’s civil liability regime for passenger air carriage suffers from fragmentation. It is recommended that a separate statute on civil liability in air carriage be enacted, thereby rendering the system of private air law more coherent. From the perspective of substantive content, Taiwan’s legal framework governing the civil liability of air carriers has undergone little change over the years and lacks modernity. It is therefore suggested that the relevant provisions of the Montreal Convention concerning the civil liability of passenger air carriers be taken into account for reform.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、前言
貳、1999 年蒙特婁公約之國際航空旅客運送人責任
一、蒙特婁公約概觀
二、對旅客傷亡之責任
三、對行李運送之責任
四、遲到責任
五、過失相抵
六、責任限制
七、運送人之受僱人或代理人援用責任限制
八、先行付款
九、對第三人之求償權
十、運送人之最低強制責任
參、我國民用航空法上航空旅客運送人責任之規定及其檢討
一、對旅客傷亡之責任
二、對行李運送之責任
三、遲到責任
四、過失相抵
五、責任限制
六、運送人之受僱人或代理人援用責任限制
七、先行付款
八、對第三人之求償權
九、運送人之最低強制責任
肆、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|