| 關 鍵 詞： |
國際私法；國際管轄；合意管轄；適切法院；當事人意思自主 |
| 中文摘要： |
涉外民商法律關係之當事人得以合意選擇管轄法院，並且得選任外國法院為排他、專屬管轄法院；當事人間針對國際合意管轄之合意，不以雙方簽名為必要；國際合意管轄之範圍不限於契約關係，倘當事人業已明確約定與某交易有關之「任何爭議」均應由某一特定法院為唯一管轄法院，無論原告係基於契約、侵權或不當得利等法律關係訴請給付，均應受合意管轄約款之拘束；國際合意管轄約款是否顯失公平，應綜合考量主客觀等各項因素判斷之，不因原告須至境外起訴即認顯失公平。
|
| 英文關鍵詞： |
Private International law；International Jurisdiction；Choice of Court/Choice of Forum；Appropriate Forum；Party Autonomy |
| 英文摘要： |
Parties to a cross border civil and commercial legal relationship may agree to enter into a choice of court agreement and may designate a foreign state as a sole and exclusive forum. A choice of forum agreement between the parties is not required to be signed by both parties. The scope of the choice of forum agreement is not limited to contractual relationships. If the parties have clearly agreed that “any dispute” relating to a specific transaction shall be subject to a specific court as the sole and exclusive jurisdiction, the parties shall be bound by the choice of court agreement, regardless of whether the plaintiff is seeking performance based on contractual, tort, or unjust enrichment legal relationships. Whether a choice of court agreement is manifestly unfair should be judged by comprehensively considering various subjective and objective factors, and should not be deemed manifestly unfair simply because the plaintiff has to file a lawsuit abroad.
|
| 目 次： |
壹、引言
貳、案例事實及訴訟過程
參、判決結論及理由
肆、評析
一、學說見解
二、過去實務見解
三、本文意見
四、本則見解對學界和實務的影響
伍、結論
|
| 相關法條： |
 |
| 相關判解： |
|
| 相關函釋： |
|
| 相關論著： |
|